Subject:
|
Re: Lego Purity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:39:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4612 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Eaton wrote:
0.67/10!? Not shure, but whatever. I really don’t mind.
http://www.suave.net/~dave/cgi/lego_purism.cgi?stats=1&rid=23431190746102
My question is, since most who rated clones 1/5, also rated modding clones 1/5,
so if you consider clones a blasphemy, wouldn’t modding clones then be a moot
point?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Lego Purity
|
| So, after being pointed at a (URL) thread on Classic-Space by Felix Greco>, I figured it might be interesting to see how the community feels about Lego purity in general. So, I made a little test: (URL) Right now, it's only got my own information, (...) (17 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX) !!
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
