Subject:
|
Re: Lego Purity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:09:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4627 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tommy Armstrong wrote:
| |
Got to be something wrong with the scoring as I put three down as blasphemy
and rest fine with me, but still got a 0.00--impossible in any kind of
scoring scheme I can think of. Especially since the scores were defined with
two significant digits.
|
Heh, yep, that’s precisely how it’s supposed to work :) If you’re ok with things
like gluing, using stickers, etc, then you’re not as big of a purist! If you
count everything as blasphemous, though, then you’re a pretty definite purist!
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) yea, I understand that, but I cannot be a pure non-purist which is what a 0.00 score would indicate if I thought 3 were blasphemous. I mean, by picking three as blasphemous, I have contaiminated the purity of my "non-purity" and therefore I (...) (17 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) Got to be something wrong with the scoring as I put three down as blasphemy and rest fine with me, but still got a 0.00--impossible in any kind of scoring scheme I can think of. Especially since the scores were defined with two significant (...) (17 years ago, 26-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
