Subject:
|
Re: Lego Purity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:49:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4756 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Eaton wrote:
> Admittedly, that part makes me feel dirty...
So, then, the way you're fudging the LEGO purity scores... makes you less pure?
Wow, this could get needlessly self-referential...
--
Brian "8.2 and rising" Davis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego Purity
|
| (...) Alright, I sneakily changed how it calculates things behind-the-scenes, so... you're still low, but not *AS* low. Basically, I was using a weighted average and a straightforward "distance from the mean" method for calculating scoring. I now (...) (17 years ago, 25-Sep-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
