 | | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) Do you mean the indented quoted text on the full-article view? Too light and too small? (...) Would it be better if the first More: All | Brief | Compact link on each group page repeated the 4 shown messages when you clicked it? In other (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) Yes and no. I hadn't actually noticed that yet when I posted that, but yes, I find the quoted text too small/light/hard to read. I thought it worked quite well when quoted text was simply italicized and faded once, rather than getting (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) And, as I forgot to mention, the text size is also too small (for me) to be comfortably scanned on the compact listings (and presumably on the others, as well) (...) OO! OO! Tried it. Liked it. No further testing necessary. Now, if only I (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) OK, lots of other people were having the same gripe about it. It's fixed now. (...) You're saying you have an issue of readability with the font size? Can you send a screenshot? (...) What if clicking "Brief" gave you #96-#77, and clicking (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
OK, you've forced me out of lurkerdom with the new interface. I realize as a lurker, my opinions may be less valuable than some, but since you seem to be open to suggestions... I like seeing the recent news on the front page, but I would prefer to (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) I could make the subject line one size larger in the compact listings, if that would help. It's at SIZE="-2" now, and it could probably go to SIZE="-1" and still fit 20 messages on a 800x600 laptop display. (...) OK, give that a shot now. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) Yes, but for reasons too complicated to explain, not 'til later tonight. To hazard an opinion, I would suggest that size=-1/-2 is just too small for most uses. (...) More or less, yes. On an average (work) day, I'm accessing the 'net through (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) That would make life happier. (...) Wow. Has anyone ever told you that you're amazing, Todd? I know where my nomination for 'webmaster of the decade' is going. (...) Every single message I've looked at does it. I've taken a peek at a couple (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) Oh. I think I know what you mean now. There's really nothing odd going on there. You're just seeing the natural width of the articles -- they're all 80-column text. It's probably just a bit misleading because they're shown in the default (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) everything's ok ;-) Thanks again for being the most responsive webmaster on the face of the planet. James (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
(...) OK, check out the traffic page now. (URL) 4 messages is NEVER enough to catch up after a few hours of work. 20 is (...) The 4-message intro pages aren't really intended to be used as a newsreader. They're there as an invitation to see what a (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) Let's try this... Let's try an old 1994 web design trick: Not setting any LINK= or VLINK= attributes at all in the <BODY> tag, and letting the browser use its defaults, whatever they may be (usually bright blue and dark magenta). How does it (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) <In best televangelist voice> "Ah cahn see!" To be slightly more informative: That does make a difference. The links are significantly more distinct, regardless of the size of the little box. It also doesn't detract from the impression of the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
(...) I like it! I like it a lot better! Now if you could attach the message titles to the little blue squares and make a bigger mousing target I'd be completely happy. Well actually, while you're at it there is one more small thing, and someone (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
(...) Try again now. :) (...) Here's some important information about search boxes: (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
(...) OK, now there's a way to switch modes when you enter a group area -- you can click the "Redisplay: All | Compact" links to switch views. If you want to read just some specific group without its subgroups, you can also click a special link in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 Things...
|
|
(...) Thank you! Lugnet looks wonderful with my colors (works well with the background colors, too), which I've found to work on just about every website I've been to! ;) Link color: R0 G128 B0 (Green) Vlink color: R128 G64 B0 (Brownish-Orange) Jeff (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
(...) Yeah, that's it! And the "gimme 40 more messages" button is even better. (...) I realize you can indirectly get to the set picture by typing the number in the "search newsgroups" box and then hitting the link at the top. I was just hoping to (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
(...) You can always do what I did: put a link to the Browse Pause page in your toolbar. It is the same number of clicks, but you don't have to type a URL, and if you need to look for a set that you don't know the number for, all the data is right (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
|
(...) perfect. (...) Oh! No! You're ruining it! So far Todd has done everything I asked for. Your solution would require actual work on MY part. Actually it would require ALL users to do extra work. And I would have to add this to every machine that (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
