Subject:
|
Re: Pre-Fathers Day LEGO Present Delivered to Work
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Jun 2001 21:33:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3030 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Brad Hamilton writes:
>
> Rick Kujawa <spacerocks@iname.com> wrote in message
> news:GF1HyL.GEL@lugnet.com...
> > Duplo first. I see a Lego crib. :)
>
> Actually, we are thinking that the plain wooden blocks might be the best to
> start. My parents tell me that I started playing with these at only 8
> months old! These blocks say that they are for ages 2 and up but I guess I
> was an early starter. We were thinking that the blocks would be better
> because you just stack them. It seems like Duplo would be hard to put
> together and take apart.
Wood blocks are neat too. Esp. for an infant. I always played with stuff made
for older kids too. If you go by the specified ages we would of had to quit
Lego at 10. I think I was 3 when I started Lego until about 12 then the dark
ages came.
> Hmm. Our little one may not even like LEGO. My dad is into making regular
> plastic models and model railroad (G & HO). I've never really gotten into
> either of those hobbies much.
Watch your little one grow up to be a welder, etc.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
32 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
