Subject:
|
Re: Use of LEGO on album cover... legal or no?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:10:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
426 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> I
> am curious, however, why they didn't quash Eric Harshbarger's desk that he
> sold. They should have been more on the ball there.
What on Earth are you talking about? That's like saying, "I don't know why Big
Lumber Company didn't sue when John Carpenter made a desk out of their wood and
sold it on eBay."
The album cover makes much more sense. It's pretty clear that they don't like
the fact that their trademarked art- ie, the faces printed on the heads- is
being used to make someone else a profit.
Try selling the sculpture itself, and I seriously doubt LEGO would have a
problem with it.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Use of LEGO on album cover... legal or no?
|
| In lugnet.general, Brendan Powell Smith writes: [snip] (...) Well, I guess I'll share a bit of my opinion on the LEGO brand, trademarks, etc. I firmly believe LEGO is overstepping their bounds here. The only thing they really have going for them in (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
