|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Dave Schuler writes:
> but
> can't we at least agree that we're on the verge of being better off
> Lego-wise than ever before? Yes, Juniorization stinks. Yes, much of the
> 2001 product line is uninspired and uninspiring.
Here's where I disagree with you- I definitely feel that we are better off
LEGO-wise than we were even as recently as, say, 1998 or 1999. The sets are
better, with far less juniorization; we have bulk packs available, and more on
the way; we have definite signs that LEGO is interested in engaging the adult
market on several levels...
personally, I see this all as great, and hopefully getting better.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | What would it take?
|
| With the recent Microsoft announcement, a number of us have expressed opinions of varying negativity for reasons ranging from the well-founded to the kneejerk. Similarly, following the implementation of the bulk sale service, quite a few people (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![What would it take? -Dave Schuler (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tim Courtney (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Kevin Zwicker (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Dave Schuler (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tony Kilaras (15-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Amy Hughes (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Dave Schuler (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![zactly -Paul Hartzog (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: zactly -Timothy D. Freshly (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: zactly -Mike Timm (13-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: zactly -Thomas Main (16-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: zactly -Timothy D. Freshly (16-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: zactly -Andy Lynch (16-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Ronald Vallenduuk (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![VERY well said Duq -Paul Hartzog (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tim Culberson (14-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tony Kilaras (15-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tim Culberson (15-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|