| |
> I think part of the problem is that AFOLs have it so easy nowadays. I can
> remember the days when this was a barren frontier, when the only AFOL
> presence I ever saw was a few posts a day on alt.toys.lego (if that) and we
> weren't even a grain of sand to TLG. We've got it pretty good nowadays
> folks. Not to say there isn't room to do better (there always is) but some
> chilling out needs to happen. S***ing all over every new initiative Lego
> attempts is, at the very least, unproductive, and at worst will turn TLG off
> completely. Lego doesn't have to do anything for us. They don't owe us a
> damn thing. Remember that. Easy come, easy go.
Do you really think that this is the way TLG thinks? Do you really
think TLG will "turn off" completely because we complain too much? I
think not - I think they will be looking at our complaints and going "if
this is what will make them give us money - then lets do it!" They
don't owe us anything but we sure as heck don't owe them a damn thing
either man - REMEMBER THAT! We don't owe TLG as a company huge bouts of
praise.
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What would it take?
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G72BJq.L6y@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) a (...) would (...) deal (...) at (...) I'm glad you brought this up. I agree most of what you're saying here. This is, BY FAR, the most significant (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
