|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Kevin Zwicker writes:
> And I agree that some of the negative responses to the train contest were a
> little extreme. However, I believe they are more indicative of people with a
> true passion for their hobby that feel that they have let down too often in
> the last 4 or 5 years.
This is a good point. Folks are responding, I think, not out of
beligerence or because they're mean people, but rather because they feel
strongly about the hobby and have certain ideals they'd like to see advanced.
> We often accuse TLC of dumbing-down their products, catering to those who
> aren't patient enough to put together a complex set and those who want
> instant gratification. Yet, we are guilty (myself included) of wanting the
> same thing. We want everything from TLC done right and done now.
That is a *great* point!
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: What would it take?
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) <Snip> I think alot of us are still bitter over the introduction of juniorisation nad the change in marketing strategy. I think for many, it came as a total surprise. Most of us grew up during (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![What would it take? -Dave Schuler (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Eric Joslin (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tim Courtney (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Kevin Zwicker (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tony Kilaras (15-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Amy Hughes (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Dave Schuler (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![zactly -Paul Hartzog (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: zactly -Timothy D. Freshly (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: zactly -Mike Timm (13-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: zactly -Thomas Main (16-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: zactly -Timothy D. Freshly (16-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: zactly -Andy Lynch (16-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Ronald Vallenduuk (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![VERY well said Duq -Paul Hartzog (12-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tim Culberson (14-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tony Kilaras (15-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: What would it take? -Tim Culberson (15-Jan-01 to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|