| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
>
> > Because some of use aren't so uptight about model designs that we feel
> > the need
> > to "protect" them from TLC, and would actually very much *like* to have
> > instructions for our models, without having to suffer through an anitquated
> > home-brewed CAD program to create them.
>
> Well, the data format is a bit arcane but I'm not sure I'd characterise
> MLCad (to pick my favorite) as "antiquated"... it's pretty slick. But that's
> just my opinion, of course. It's been years since I last played with AutoCAD.
>
> I'd ask this, is CAD (even specialised to the Lego palette) one of TLC's
> core competencies? Should it be? I dunno.
Hello - anyone ?!?
Who do you think is going to make the program for this thing?
Let's see?... Eric Harshbarger ... ????!!!
Isn't he responsible for the Mosaic program...?!?!
Isn't he the guy who LEGO features in their newsletter?
Isn't he the programmer who already has a rudimentary LEGO CAD program on his
own site?!?? (Just like his rudimentary 'mosaic' program...)
(DUH) Someone needs to get him on board.
I can see this one a mile away.
-Jon
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) Well, the data format is a bit arcane but I'm not sure I'd characterise MLCad (to pick my favorite) as "antiquated"... it's pretty slick. But that's just my opinion, of course. It's been years since I last played with AutoCAD. I'd ask this, is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
