 | | Re: A Public Apology
|
|
"Mike Rayhawk" <mike@brikwars.com> wrote in message news:Hn8FKs.MvB@lugnet.com... (...) contains (...) trustworthy (...) source of (...) in the (...) face. What!? What do you mean that it's not a source of well-researched and accurate information!? (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A Public Apology
|
|
While I appreciate your apology, I do not use brickwars as a source of well-research and accurate information. I use the official ninja website. I do not understand why said site would be sued, as any ninja that would be offended would simply flip (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | A Public Apology
|
|
I got an email today to the BrikWars contact address from a very offended reader. Apparently one of the quotes in the Medieval Japan supplement contains misleading information; specifically, the one in chapter MJ.6: Ninjas: "Facts: 1. Ninjas are (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars) !
|
| |
| | Hey Cool!
|
|
Wow! My ship, the U.S.S. Katheryn, is the Random ship of the Month! Cool! :) Nathan PS - Katheryn's getting lonely - new Starship vessels coming soon! (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickQuest: The Haunted Keep (Teaser)
|
|
(...) Well, we started playing, but there were too many distractions--we didn't have enough MichLUG members to watch the rest of the display and interact with the crowd. We got about 1/3 of the way through my scenario and had to call it (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Big Arbor Email Problems...
|
|
I have some very, very bad news... My hotmail account, left unattended for a few weeks, last checked a few days ago, was above the SPAM limit. Seemingly, after going over the limit, Hotmail decided to "clean" and deleted most of the old Starship (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Pacific action emails not up to date
|
|
(...) Damn. The New Pacific email is marked read, not unread like it should be. Replying now, sorry. -Dan (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Pacific action emails not up to date
|
|
Actually, the only two outstanding action emails are for the Blue Nomad and the Errant Kangaroo - everyone else I owe an email is up to date I think. I note that it was August since I last heard from the Carpathian or the Arrakis, and the Glimmer of (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | New Pacific action emails not up to date
|
|
Sorry sportsfans, but the registry fun and games means that I won't finish action emails until Wednesday. Apologies all round... (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
(...) Done. I also noted in the ship lists that the Valach was lost, and discounted your Treaty of Spraw system counts to remove the Valach. (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Richard Parsons wrote: -snip- (...) Well if you insist Richard ; ) All you gotta do is these few things: 1. change the UFS Hammerhead to Hammerhead and UFS Valach to Valach 2. change the organizations on the Hammerhead and (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
Ok, so I have excised seperate pages for all those players whose number of player ships exceeds 3 - being Andrew, Dan, David, Hendo, JHK, Sean, and me. This leaves the ones and twos on the main homepage (which seems to me to make sense). For those (...) (21 years ago, 18-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
Dudes, I have reset the order of the main ships list to straight alphabetical as suggested. Those of you who registered your vessels with the name "The insert rest of ship name here" may wish to reconsider the most appropriate name for your vessel (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | (IC) GNN: Battle Erupts; Ship Destroyed
|
|
(URL) This just in from our sources in Val-Central. The starhip Hell's Fury (formerly of the USC) continues its attack against Billundian FSPC vessels near the planet Anutis. The Formian Union's navy is apparently assisting the Fury with shots fired (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Arbor Action Emails
|
|
(2 URLs) Arbor Sector Action Emails will be going out ASAP according to my schedule. 8th grade really sucks as of late, with projects up the wazoo (5 in one month, not including 4 for English!). I've also been studying and such, so I've not had time (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hendo...
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, John P. Henderson wrote: -snipped me- (...) Massachusetts was worse than RI? Wow... Wind was so bad in my backyard it twisted the $600 pool (all liner but with metal holding things) and ripped the elbows into two. And it (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Weekly Reports 10/17/03
|
|
Galactic Greetings! Phew... After a week and a half of not being near a computer much, and then after (as I predicted earlier tonight) at least one loss of power to my household, I have successfully sent off galactic travel reports and all my SM (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: More new ships in the pipeline
|
|
(...) I actually came up with a list of types of ships for myself way back when we were developing this galaxy. Passenger Liners, Steamers (small cargo vessels that can be easily fitted for passenger or destroyer use), Hospital Ships, Colony Ships, (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
(...) Actually, in one of the earlier versions of the registry, I had the ships listed alphabetically including the prefixes (USS, HES, etc.). In so doing, any player who gave all his ships the same prefix would automatically have his ships grouped (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Location of Blue Nomad being narrowed down (was: Emergency distress call from the Blue Nomad)
|
|
(...) Just to confirm your info... My records indicate the starship Blue Nomad arrived in New Pacific sector on July 4th of this Galactic Year and has remained there since. I apologize if any stellar interference prevented that data reaching any of (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
