Subject:
|
Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Apr 1999 16:15:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JSPROAT@antispamGEOCITIES.COM
|
Viewed:
|
1509 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> Would an 'exclude' also be useful in addition to 'include'? (Both are
> relatively easy to implement.)
At what level would Exclude be in the way? Would you nix all items in the
"excluded" file? Would it be selective, allowing certain headers (such as
Subject) to remain? What purpose would it serve?
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"I prefer the term para-mental. It keeps me out of the loony bin."
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) Oh, it was just a thought. I kind of like the simplicity of the robots.txt format. You include and exclude things, and each layer modifies previous layers. Kind of also like the way Unix directory permissions work. One example purpose that an (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) Off-the-wall question -- haven't thought about this -- just tossing it out: Would an 'exclude' also be useful in addition to 'include'? (Both are relatively easy to implement.) --Todd (25 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
