Subject:
|
Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 May 1999 22:38:09 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocities.com!spamcake!
|
Viewed:
|
1579 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> One example purpose that an exclude might serve could be saying from the top
> level that everything is included by default, but the .off-topic hierarchy
> is excluded by default. That seems simpler to me than having each entry in
> the .off-topic hierarchy state that it doesn't go into the root (below some
> threshold).
What you're talking about sounds more like an inherited directory filter
than a header exclude. Hmmm, could this be solved by placing a token file
at strategic spots in the directory structure?
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"I prefer the term para-mental. It keeps me out of the loony bin."
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) OK, yes, that's a good way of putting it. I guess I still don't understand what you mean by the include mechanism for headers. I'll have to go back and read the threads more carefully... (...) Maybe; but it wouldn't allow specialized (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) Oh, it was just a thought. I kind of like the simplicity of the robots.txt format. You include and exclude things, and each layer modifies previous layers. Kind of also like the way Unix directory permissions work. One example purpose that an (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
