Subject:
|
Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Apr 1999 05:01:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1580 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
> But a lot of that extra work can be alleviated by using include.
Off-the-wall question -- haven't thought about this -- just tossing it out:
Would an 'exclude' also be useful in addition to 'include'? (Both are
relatively easy to implement.)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) At what level would Exclude be in the way? Would you nix all items in the "excluded" file? Would it be selective, allowing certain headers (such as Subject) to remain? What purpose would it serve? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
| (...) This was my original argument for include. However, Todd already has a mechanism to figure this out on the fly. (...) Not necessarily. There are situations where you don't want to assume association with all parent directories. For example, we (...) (26 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
