| |
In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Marchetti writes:
> I have a real problem with Lugnet being considered Todd and Suzanne's
> exclusive sandbox -- in reality, it is and it isn't depending on what part
> we are examining. People contribute time, money, content, scans, etc. It
> strikes me as a community effort in MANY ways. It's a little too heavy in
> attitude to just assert that we cannot support clones brands in some way in
> the database and to provide no reasons for this posture.
It's not in the business plan.
> Maybe I would feel differently if I knew the costs, or other efforts
> involved. From where I am sitting, Todd has all the structure, programming,
> bandwidth, etc. It looks like the costs come down to space on a server hard
> drive somewhere and the scanned contributions that would comprise the
> content.
It's also a matter of principle.
> I don't want to hammer Todd, but perhaps something more than a terse
> one-liner is required here by way of response.
LUGNET would not be LUGNET.
> So watch it, Baldy!
>
> =)
>
> -- Richard (also baldly going)
--Todd (also baldly going :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
