Subject:
|
Re: The NEW Castle World!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:57:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2412 times
|
| |
|
|
Do you object to maintaining the archive as a completely separate link from the
new site? If yes, why should it disappear? Just because people are now long
absent, doesn’t mean that their existing contributions aren’t worth preserving
in some way. I mean, look at brickshelf -- the whole thing is just an archive
of what has gone before, even if “before” is just yesterday.
Do you object to Craig’s logo artwork? If you object to the logo, what do you
propose we use instead?
Also, am I not making it clear that the ONLY thing I propose we retain from the
old CW is the logo button? I thought just the ONE thing as a connection to the
past wasn’t too bad of an idea. Plus, it was entirely based on official Lego
stuff, as I have shown.
I propose a TOTALL NEW CW, and an archive as one teeny link off the main page of
the new site. You would begrudge past CW contributors their measly 5-6 MB?
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The NEW Castle World!
|
| (...) No no, please don't misunderstand me. I'm perfectly happy with keeping an archive of the old CW. Like I said, it's healthy to look back at the past and what others have done. (...) I don't object to Craig's artwork, and in fact would be (...) (21 years ago, 15-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The NEW Castle World!
|
| (...) I have no problem with the idea of keeping the old website in tact, but all it is at the moment is a museum for the days gone by anyway. (...) I mean no disrespect, and I'm sure that Craig is a great artist, but so what? IOM never revealed (...) (21 years ago, 14-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
