To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 18211
18210  |  18212
Subject: 
Re: Castle = yes
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 06:31:48 GMT
Viewed: 
3855 times
  
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Don Cox wrote:

> In Classic Castle, we never had enough Black Falcons, Crusaders, Crossed
> Axes, etc, etc, to man the walls.

> Bulk horses, cows, steers and Bufalo for the Western theme.  Bulk arms,
> legs, hips.  Bulk swords, muskests, rifles, yes and even pitchforks.
> Blank shields in the different shapes.

Although I am sympathetic to the idea of having more generic 'figs in
sets, I don't really agree that "we never had enough Black Falcons . . .
to man the walls".  Looking back, Castle sets over the years have a very
high ratio of 'figs and accessories to bricks.  The large TLC castles of
yore were dripping with 'figs---try finding bunk and stable room inside
6080 for it's twelve 'figs and four horses.

Of course, Town and Space were (are) similarly 'fig-to-brick heavy, but
people in those themes could go out and buy buckets of appropriately
colored brick.  In Castle, unless you bought set 805[0], you could only
buy LEGOLAND sets brimming with 'figs to get the parts to build those
walls.

Minifigs are very nice, though. . .which might be why I *still* go out and
buy Black Falcons instead of getting the gray bricks I need to make use of
them.

I've never really understood why there are castle accessory packs---I've
always had more than enough weapons and helmets for my 'figs[1], and
thanks to TLC's predilection for horse carts there is an ahistorically
large population of Lego horses (and wheels).  Consider a set like
http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/6022-1
which has two 'figs and a horse, and weapons for two more 'figs.  You
could build an army with that set, and most of the contemporary sets were
similarly heavy on the accessories.

> It seems the trend for TLC is large many hundreds of pieces sets with
> $100.00 plus in cost.  Make these sets in smaller sections to add to a
> bigger set.

Wasn't this the idea of the Jabba the Hutt and Hogwarts sets?  Not as
transparent as the peg-and-hole system of the '80s, but present.

--
TWS Garrison
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/
Remove capital letters in address for direct reply.

[0] It never occurred to me to do this when I was in the Demographic.

[1] Of course, I can see having extra equipment if you want to have all
your Castle 'figs similarly equipped[2], want to draft non-Castle 'figs
into Castle, or have lots of soldiers that are wearing crowns.

[2] Like I do. . .



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Castle = yes
 
(...) The problem LOTR, Braveheart and other films is that they are not suitable for Lego, and I don't mean the Lego Company, I'm talking about us. TLC can make Orcs, Cavalry (Riders of Rohan) troops (Gondor, Irish, Scots, English men-at-arms), etc. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)

20 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR