To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 18178
18177  |  18179
Subject: 
Re: Castle = yes
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:56:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1197 times
  
In lugnet.castle, James Stacey wrote:
Anyone care to speculate, educate, extrapolate what was meant by Brad in his
talk
http://news.lugnet.com/events/nwbrickcon/?n=153

Could it be, Lego are making moves towards a new Castle Lego line, certainly
they should be motivated by the success of the MegaBloxs Dragons line. I
can't see them releasing another Castle Legend or Moc until they have
catered for some of the undersupported themes (although they would be
welcome) Reading the reasons for releasing the reworked SW sets, it would
appear they consider their core market to change completely in a 4 or 5 year
period, a lot of young Lego fans havent ever known Castle Lego except the
Legends and MOC series. I'd hope any new Lego range would follow the high
standard of these offerings :)

any thoughts, anyone, Bueller, anyone

Personally, I see three different ideas behind his statement.

Of course, these are only opinions, so regard them as such.

1.  As it was said in a recent thread in the Classic-Castle forums about Harry
Parter (funny picture was involved, no minifigs were actually hurt), LEGO could
be taking the time in Harry Parter... err Potter to recharge their thinking, to
ressurect castle after the recent Castle themes, to start over.

2.  After reading the whole of Brad's talk the other day, I began to wonder if
LEGO's love of licenses and partnerships might cause them to form one for
castle.  However, I just can't think of what they might license for themselves.
I mean, LOTR would be an obvious choice, but Intelliblock (or whatever it was)
already has the LOTR contract, unless they cancelled it do to sales.  I don't
know... Dragon Riders of Pern?  Braveheart?  I just don't see this thing
happening.

3.  Or finally, LEGO has so loved the Harry Potter line, and since they view it
as 'castle,' that they don't view LEGO Castle as dead or dormant as we do, and
thus any questions regarding Castle is answered while referring to that line.

Anyway, that's my two cents.

--Anthony



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Castle = yes
 
(...) I think this is most probably. However, leaving Juniorization can only happen if TLG expects it's target audience to be patient enough to build a detailed model. For us, thats the prime reason to buy a set, but for most kid fans, it's playing (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Castle = yes
 
Anyone care to speculate, educate, extrapolate what was meant by Brad in his talk (URL) it be, Lego are making moves towards a new Castle Lego line, certainly they should be motivated by the success of the MegaBloxs Dragons line. I can't see them (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.castle)

20 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR