|
In lugnet.castle, Aaron West writes:
> One thing that I have been
> persuaded to agree to from building experience is that the castle wall piece
> that we all value so much is really a handicap. You must build around it
> most of the time, they don't flow well into a large wall, they are too thin
> and they increase the expense of a LEGO set...... I have a bunch
> of these castle wall pieces, but I would rather just had grey bricks I
> think.
I heartily agree. A big turn-off for me (and the reason I voted against the
BFF in the Legends vote) for any castle set is the inclusion of too many
panel walls. I almost never use them. They make for less flexible building
styles, and IMO they look less like a real castle than a bunch of blocks.
That said, I did get the Western set Fort Legoredo and loved it despite the
inclusion of a whole bunch of those log-wall panels. So I'm not a complete
purist on this. (Though I would have much preferred a huge pile of 1x4
brown log bricks.)
> The only thing that a CURRENT MARKET AVAILABILITY LEGO builder will
> be thwarted by is the lack of army building mini figures and weapons.
Agreed. But it does seem fairly easy to get set 4806, Axe Cart.
http://guide.lugnet.com/set/4806
I got a bunch of those on sale and they each have two axes, two crossbows, a
spear, and a shield.
I have, though, bought most of my castle figs on e-bay or bricklink.
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Dead men tell no tales!
|
| (...) In my blessed opinion, Harry Potter and Star Wars have been the best thing for LEGO Castle accessory set development since the invention of the mini figure. Why? I get lots of nice parts in new designs and colors that stimulate my creativity. (...) (22 years ago, 25-Aug-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|