Subject:
|
Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:50:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7863 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.ray, Travis Cobbs wrote:
| |
I’m working on a different rendering method (for instructions) using POV-Ray,
and I wanted to get some opinions about the output. On that note, I have two
sample renderings in two different sizes, and I’d like to get people’s
feedback. Note that I’m purposely not saying anything about how they were
created (other than the fact that POV-Ray was used), because that would
affect the results in a way that I’m not ready for yet. (I have at least one
specific thing that I want to see if people notice, but if I say anything
more, I won’t get good data.) I will follow up this post later with more
details (hopefully after having gotten responses).
|
On my monitor, version 1 certainly looks cleaner and sharper. I will be
interested to see how you accomplished this. It might get me back into creating
instructions again, which is something I have stopped doing because I was
getting so frustrated with try to make all the different software play nice
together. :)
Allan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Opinions sought on rendering method
|
| I'm working on a different rendering method (for instructions) using POV-Ray, and I wanted to get some opinions about the output. On that note, I have two sample renderings in two different sizes, and I'd like to get people's feedback. Note that I'm (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
