| |
"Lars C. Hassing" wrote:
>
> Tore Eriksson wrote...
> > You mean something like:
>
>
> Uh, maybe. However, if you have a 2x2 brick on top of the 2x4, how do you
> leave out only half the TOP section? Or you wouldn't?
> Maybe parts should be broken into subparts for analysis?
> I think the main problem is, that whether you can switch to a simple part,
> depends on the use of the part.
I think this is a little too much for the task, you don't need to try
to remove the interior too, it won't make a big difference. Think of a
2x2 plate, if you can remove the stud4, you're saving 48 quads, 64 lines
and 32 optional lines while removing the interior walls only saves 9
quads and 12 lines. The difference gets much bigger when you start to
look at 2x4 plates, 6x16 plates... :)
Leonardo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| Tore Eriksson wrote... (...) Uh, maybe. However, if you have a 2x2 brick on top of the 2x4, how do you leave out only half the TOP section? Or you wouldn't? Maybe parts should be broken into subparts for analysis? I think the main problem is, that (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
