Subject:
|
Re: Site change suggestion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:42:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
743 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw Fredrik Glöckner
> > Actually, I've been thinking about commenting on the ldraw.org content
> > myself. It's this text that I find somewhat bothering:
> > "Do you enjoy LDraw but hate the old DOS interface?"
> Would a more suitable phrase be 'Do you find the old DOS interface
> difficult to use, and would like to see something more mouse-oriented
> for parts placement and editing?'
Not speaking for Frederik, but I think it's simply a matter of levels of
expertise. It's not necessarily true that the old DOS interface is more
difficult or bothersome, but that it appeals more to an expert user.
Conversely, the MLCad UI appeals more to a beginning-level user. (No offense
intended, Lar. :-)
I would've suggested that there be a "power-user page" to accomodate the
"newbie page", but then that's what the FAQ is for, right? :-,
Cheers,
- jsproat
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Site change suggestion
|
| (...) And none taken. I use too many different pieces of software to be more than a beginning level user in a lot of them. Not because I don't use them over and over, but because I have too much stuff to remember. What scares me is that I'm starting (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Site change suggestion
|
| (...) I've talked to a few people recently who do that, and I didn't realize actually how many of them there were. (...) Ok. (...) Would a more suitable phrase be 'Do you find the old DOS interface difficult to use, and would like to see something (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
