Subject:
|
Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jun 1999 19:36:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
806 times
|
| |
|
|
On 6/16/99, at 3:05 PM, Tim Courtney wrote:
> At 06:54 PM 6/16/99 +0000, Bram Lambrecht wrote:
> > Sub-models are not only used so that they can be easily • positioned. They
> > are used to make following the instructions easier. Inlining • a sub-model
> > defeats the purpose of creating the sub-model in the first • place because
> > the sub-model is then surrounded by all the peices you wanted • to detract
> > attention from! Whether you leave the inlined header makes no
> > difference--you could just as easily have added the peices • without using
> > any sub-models.
> > I hope I was clear this time.
>
> You're making a lot more sense now. I understand better what • you're trying
> to say and I agree with where you're coming from. Part of the • purpose of
> the OMR is to provide 3d virtual instructions, so this would • help in this
> case. They should not be inlined. However, if you make a • submodel (to
> ease creation in ldraw) that is not in the instructions and has • nothing to
> do with our moving parts idea, then it should be inlined so it • appears like
> it does in the actual instructions.
Yes, you are making more sense now. HAVE you looked at the
instructions
for the set in question? In this case the biggest reason for
inlining as a
submodel is because the pieces are going to be anchored in place
and not
movable. Also when the submodel is placed in the instructions
all the pieces
are visable, so there isn't the need for a submodel because you
need to be
able to see what parts are being used. If the submodel was
partially hidden
from view then I would say to keep it as a submodel(not
inlined).
The biggest reason for keeping it as a submodel(not inlined)
would be because
it is an official submodel.
I think it really could go either way.
Ryan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
| (...) You're making a lot more sense now. I understand better what you're trying to say and I agree with where you're coming from. Part of the purpose of the OMR is to provide 3d virtual instructions, so this would help in this case. They should not (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
