Subject:
|
Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jun 1999 15:15:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
901 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> writes:
> At 01:20 PM 6/16/99 +0000, Scott R Dennett wrote:
> > So name it like any other submodel, inline and leave the header?
> > Seems OK.
>
> Yep.
I don't see the point of inlineing any submodels unless they aren't
official submodels. If the instructions use a submodel, why inline it?
Seems like kind of a waste in making the submodel in the first place...
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
| Bram, I think the reason we would have a submodel for that submodel is because it is an official submodel. We would inline it because it is stationary; it can't be moved from where it is. Take a look at a scan of the instructions, it might help to (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
| (...) But we need to severely minimize the number of incomplete sets. Read Ampi's post. Don't think that we can make anything and everything and put it up there, there must be standards. (...) Yep. (...) No. (...) Read my post on the final file (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
