Subject:
|
Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:34:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
871 times
|
| |
|
|
At 03:15 PM 6/16/99 +0000, Bram Lambrecht wrote:
> Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> writes:
> > At 01:20 PM 6/16/99 +0000, Scott R Dennett wrote:
> > > So name it like any other submodel, inline and leave the header?
> > > Seems OK.
> >
> > Yep.
>
> I don't see the point of inlineing any submodels unless they aren't
> official submodels. If the instructions use a submodel, why inline it?
> Seems like kind of a waste in making the submodel in the first place...
The point is if the submodel does not contain *any* moving parts, why make
it a seperate model? Though we do have the available space filename-wise,
it does seem kinda silly. But still, either way I guess is about the same
thing.
-Tim Courtney
ldraw.org Project Coordinator
http://www.ldraw.org
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
| (...) But we need to severely minimize the number of incomplete sets. Read Ampi's post. Don't think that we can make anything and everything and put it up there, there must be standards. (...) Yep. (...) No. (...) Read my post on the final file (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
