|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) I think something Parts Tracker-like would do the job. You email the system admin, he puts you in the system. This puts a human element into voter registration instaed of some blind webbot. This also requires you to keep a current Email (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Perhaps a voter confirmation email sent when a vote is cast, similar to how LUGNET authenticates posts? So, voting could be done via the web, but in order to confirm, you would also have to reply to an email. Just another idea... -Tim (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) not sure I see where this is any better than requiring a valid email address? where valid means you actually have to get your password when it's mailed to that email. The problem is, that it's really easy to get many email accounts. Inventing (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Don't forget we don't need just ONE scheme. There can be several, and you use the scheme you are most comfortable with as a prospective member. For instance: (just a thought starter) Could piggyback off something else... have a complex scheme (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) nod, good point. (...) well, while I do trust the Lugnet auth to insure that you can't post as me, I don't see how it verifies that I'm a real person, as opposed to a part of Jennifer's imagination... (...) I'm not as worried about people (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Whoa boy, backup. We not voting in a world leader to determine the lives of millions, we're voting on LSC membership. Since most people balk at even giving out their real name and Email address, I think this is a little extreme. -Orion (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Good point, Orion! Now we get to the meat. Sending in a paper ID photocopy and utility bill gives a high degree of certainty of a real person behind the ID but is pretty intrusive. (as well as labor intensive at the receiving end). Allowing (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) We've seen quite a few good (and some overboard) suggestions in this thread so far. Lar, you wrote in another message: (...) Yep. I think the right question to ask here is: Would you rather be absolutely sure everyone who votes is unique, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Ok. (...) I can accept this. There are several possible verification systems. I think we should use several, to make it easy for as many people as possible. Ultimately though, the onus should be on the applicant to prove his/her identity, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) I'd lean towards is. I'm more inclined to trust people than not to trust people, then again, that might be my weakness. (...) Yeah, sorry. One person I know signed up twice cause he thought it had something to do with news posting. Not a (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) In a scenario where multiple mechanisms are on offer, you yourself might not ever need to use it, as you'd have several other paths available. But more importantly, until we've a consensus on what level of validation is appropriate, I'd rather (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, your feelings are noted, at least by me, but I do think we haven't gotten all the possibilities developed yet. I tend to personally favor not working TOO hard to antispoof, but I'll stand by what I said, you may be inadvertantly stifling (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) The idea of personally identifiable information is indeed a sensitive one, and I recognize that. In fact, I'm a privacy freak myself - when it comes to commercial entities. The reason I included it in the recap/call for more brainstorming is (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, would that be sufficient? Only LUGNET(tm) members can be members? Is that too exclusionary? It's certainly simple enough. If it IS too exclusionary, what scheme would you suggest for those potential members who are not LUGNET members? (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, so you favor requireing a drivers license or something else more stringent then? Or restricting it to just LUGNET members only? or what? And you're OK if you go to 0 votes if any two of these are discovered to be the same when probed? What (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
