CAD Development : Search Results: Stickers in LDraw


CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw

Results 2421 – 2440 of about 7000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Announcing LDraw.org Relaunch
(...) Hi, great job, but I've a problem with my login password. When I type in my PT password I get the site with "incorrect password". Does I do something wrong or is this not ready for use? CU Bernd (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: Announcing LDraw.org Relaunch
(...) This is on the todo list but I can't tell you when we'll have it up a running again. -Orion (21 years ago, 9-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw Design Pad Version 1.5 Released
(...) (URL) for me (2003-10-09, 23:30 GMT+2) -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: Bram's LDraw and LEdit Tutorial
(...) Name: ldrawtutorial.zip Size: ~410K -Orion (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Draft
(...) The text generally looks good, but ... (...) [...] (...) This distinguishing between part-time and full-time employees seems very artificial to me in this context. I think that all the organisations that I have been employed by here in Europe (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Draft
(...) Your reasoning is sound and your edits seem reasonable to me at first read. In the interest of full disclosure, I am a part-time retail employee of the LEGO Company, and a full-time student. I'm not involved in any strategy decisions as a part (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Its been just over a week since these documents were posted. I saw one suggested change (Jacob), and no other objections to the documents as they are written. Has everyone had the chance to read through these and comment on them? I am sensing (...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) The only change made between the last posting of the document to the mail list and the posting here was in the clause Jacob addressed. Jacob's edits still leave some ambiguity - is that what we want? If in the future there is a candidate who's (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Thanks for the support, Larry! (...) OK, lets settle on a wording then. It should appear in the bylaws, because the bylaws are written to be difficult to change, where defining in the P&P would make the definition of 'professional' easy to (...) (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Well, I've mulled over in my head the possibility of another body to determine eligibility to the StC - but, it goes against my gut as adding too much bureaucracy to the org. Perhaps the bylaws should allow for a public discussion on a (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) If we write in a mechanism for determining the eligibility of candidates I agree (see my response to Ross). -Tim (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Yes. (...) I wouldn't call it radical (I thought about it too). I think it is the most practical solution. Play well, Jacob (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I can go with this solution also. Headed off to work for now, but I'll be back with this thread sometime this weekend to re-post the drafts. Ratification will take place once technical concerns have been addressed. -Tim (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I'm a sales associate at a Brand Retail store, part-time. (...) I don't see a conflict with my current job description. Like Larry, I say let it be a campaign issue. That seems to me the simplest solution. -Tim (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) [...] (...) Fair enough. (...) My position is this - there are certian levels of employment in an organization that don't allow influence over company policy, and those levels of employees should not be excluded from eligibility to be elected (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
Quoting Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com>: (...) I agree. (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I think the views are so different that it is unlikely that we can reach a consensus. There may be a majority for either of the two opinions, but I doubt it will be possible general agreement about what is the right solution. (...) Uhm. Right. (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I agree there _might_ be a conflict. I don't believe it would be true in every case. I have suggestions for generic ways of allowing exceptions [1] and will consolidate them and post them later today. -Tim [1] IMO the exception process should (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Why not turn the clause 180 degrees? If you get your paycheck from Lego, you can only be eligible after community discussion/approval? I suppose being payed by MegaBloks, or any other clone maker would need the same treatment. -- Anders (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Apologies for not making the timeframe - they're just about ready and they should be ready to go tomorrow. -Tim (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.152)

More: Next Page >>