|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
 | | Re: Foundations (Was: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings)
|
| (...) ldraw.org. It seems we all missed the most obvious name (and a good one, I think): The LDraw Organization Like Todd said, "organization" is ambiguous, so it makes a great name! --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| The *strength* of LDRAW is the Type 2 and Type 5 lines. They are key to making rendered instruction sheet output look good. AC3D is a modeller that supports both triangles and lines, with POV and DXF output. I encourage you to check it out at: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings
|
| (...) :) But I will work towards getting the best plan I believe will work at this point.. :\ (...) Ok, that is what I need to know. Also, I believe it would be appropriate to seek their permission either through this list or email (depending if (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) Agreed. I can't see it getting through the voting process, anyway. (...) view (...) Easy, boy. Non-TLG elements have their place in Ldraw. One of the uses of Ldraw is to share models, but another important use is to keep a record of your own (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Everyone, We are facing a major problem in numbering parts in LDraw. For quite some time I have been trying to follow a 3 rule plan for numbering pieces: 1. Full accuracy when possible 2. Use official TLG numbers if we have them 3. Use temporary (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
| Larry Pieniazek (lar@voyager.net) wrote: [...] (...) Sounds like a rather good idea. It would probably not be that difficult to create a LDraw to Track Designer converter. I presume that all sub-files (except for track parts) should be converted to (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| (...) It was my understanding that 'ldraw.org' would be registered with at least two "name servers". So anyone trying to access ldraw.org would have that request resolved to the correct IP address - which would be the hugin server. (I hope I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| (...) It was my understanding that 'ldraw.org' would be registered with at least two "name servers". So anyone trying to access ldraw.org would have that request resolved to the correct IP address - which would be the hugin server. (I hope I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| [followups set to lugnet.cad.dev] (...) Steve! Whoa, heavy....like...WAY COOL IDEA!!!!! How come nobody's ever suggested this yet? (Or have they?) I mean, forget all about making a Mac clone of LDraw or any other specific platform -- even Linux -- (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| Talk is cheep. I spent the last couple of days trying to pound out a quick Java Ldraw program. Check out the results: (URL) as an Applet is way too slow. Its best to download jre and try it with that: (URL) that this is terribly buggy right now and (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) time (...) Some things to think about: It would be irritating in Ldraw to have to page through lists that look like this: xxxxx.dat Blah blah blah X blah Tr. Yellow-Green yyyyy.dat Blah blah blah X blah Gold zzzzz.dat Blah blah blah X blah (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| (...) standard (...) To me, that would be the primary advantage of a Java version[1], I haven't played with LDraw much because the biggest thing that put me off is the parts database, half the models I look at seem to have missing parts and when I (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) Wait, isn't pink one of the 16 defined LDraw colors? I t doesn't need to be dithered. From ldraw.doc: ... 9 Light Blue 10 Light Green 11 Cyan 12 Light Red 13 Pink <-- LDraw color #13 14 Yellow 15 White ... Or is this pink a different shade (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Foundations (Was: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings)
|
| (...) Well, to me it looks like there are more interested in seeing the site named ldraw.org than The Ldraw Project....so that is what I will plan on calling it when I begin constructing images. My stipulation was backed by Todd's technical (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) Yeah... I was just being conservative/literal in my interpretation of the charter for the .cad.dat group. I think it really should be modified to say that it's for .DAT files based on LEGO-brand elements only. (Would this cause great unrest? I (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: newsgroup name for ldraw.org
|
| (...) Well, at the risk of sounding like I'm repeating myself, I really like the thought of a special group lugnet.trains.org for people to help plan and talk about how to set up more clubs like PNLTC and GMLTC. The .org. node is forward-expandable (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
|
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
| (...) I'm not sure the appropriate quality-level of MegaBloks could be modeled in LDraw. They'd fit together just as well as LEGO-based LDraw parts. :( Steve (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.004)
|
