Subject:
|
Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 01:35:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1170 times
|
| |
 | |
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999 12:59:54 GMT, Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@cats.nbi.dk>
wrote:
> Terry Keller:
>
> > If this is done, I think asking Jacob if having ldraw.org point to
> > hugin.risoe.dk would be OK. Jacob has a good server, reasonably fast,
> > and plenty of room.
>
> I don't think it would be possible to have ldraw.org point
> to my server, but I could have a word with our network
> administrator.
It was my understanding that 'ldraw.org' would be registered with at least
two "name servers". So anyone trying to access ldraw.org would have
that request resolved to the correct IP address - which would be the
hugin server. (I hope I understood that right)
Does that make sense?
> Jacob
>
> PS: There are only 2.7 Gb free on hugin (and I need a bit of
> it for my work).
I don't anticipate the memorial taking up a lot of room. The biggest thing
of course is the parts - the rest is pretty trivial. It would be nice to
eventually get the Jessiman family's OK to host the program directly on
the server - but that still would not need much room.
A quick check of the Geocities site shows that it now uses almost 7 mb.
Not a whole lot. I don't know how much Tim's final design will take, but if
it's significantly more than that, I would say it is bloated.
So at most the site should not take up more than, say, double of what is
currently there. Would that be too much?
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
| Terry Keller: (...) I don't think it would be possible to have ldraw.org point to my server, but I could have a word with our network administrator. Jacob PS: There are only 2.7 Gb free on hugin (and I need a bit of it for my work). ---...--- -- (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:               
       
    
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|