Subject:
|
Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 23:41:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1133 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Ross Crawford writes:
> Thanks for that explanation, however I think we still need to include type 5
> lines in parts, so that programs which don't implement this technique (eg
> ldraw) can still display the curved edges correctly. Programs which do
> implement it can simply ignore the type 5's
Sorry, I never intended to imply that it should replace type 5 lines. In
addition to the problem of backwards compatibility, this will only work for
BFC-certified parts.
--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| (...) Thanks for that explanation, however I think we still need to include type 5 lines in parts, so that programs which don't implement this technique (eg ldraw) can still display the curved edges correctly. Programs which do implement it can (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
