To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7130
7129  |  7131
Subject: 
Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:13:19 GMT
Viewed: 
617 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald wrote:

Looking at the code below I don't actually see the Z buffer offset being used,
but the one thing I did notice in the above paragraph is that he suggests
switching the culling of the wireframe copy of the geometry.

One problem: transparent surfaces would show the wireframe backside. :\

Actually, transparent surface should work fine.  As long as they are set to
write to the Z buffer when drawn, and their outlines are drawn with Z buffer
testing enabled, they should work fine.  The wireframe parts that aren't
supposed to be visible won't be drawn in the first place (which is actually
the same thing that happens for the opaque portions).

--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
 
(...) The backside wireframe elements *will* be drawn, that's the point of what Kyle was talking about. The idea is to draw the wireframe of the backside surfaces and it will all be hidden by the frontside surfaces, *except* for the lines around the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
 
(...) One problem: transparent surfaces would show the wireframe backside. :\ Steve (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

21 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR