 | | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
(...) This could be the ldlite large MPD bug again. The ldlite parser has a problem with MPD files if it runs out of cache. I increased the size for ldglite, but it may not be enough for Datsville. You could try increasing it some more and (...) (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
Don: (...) :-( (...) I'll try this. (...) I just removed all the "STEP" meta-commands. ;-) Jacob (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
(...) You should at least try the "-l3" before you recompile. I'm sort of interested in what you get for render times with both parsers. I only have somewhat underpowered PCs to work with, so I'm curious how they compare in the "real world". Don (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
Don: (...) Okay. Doing that now. The errors in the ortographic projection rendering seem to be independent of the parser. You can see an image at: (URL) corresponding command line is: ldglite -ms -i1 -s0.2 -j -l3 ~/Projekter/LEGO/Dat...D/town.mpd (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
Don: (...) Using the "l3" parser: $ time ldglite -ms -i1 -s0.2 -l3 town.mpd ... 281.790u 21.700s 8:48.81 57.3% 0+0k 0+0io 2290pf+0w $ A total of 303.49 seconds. The result: (URL) the "ld" parser: $ time ldglite -ms -i1 -s0.2 -ld town.mpd ... (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
(...) It may be OpenGL implementation specific because I remember the Mac version of ldglite had a similar problem. I've run the datsville mpd file on a few Windoze machines and it clips the model at the far plane, but doesn't add the garbage you (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
Haaaaaa!! That's a funky image! Datsville at hyperspeed! You could save that image in case you want to mix the Datsville and Star Wars themes. :) Mike (...) (23 years ago, 15-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
Don: (...) Definitely. (...) Yup. :-( Jacob (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
(...) I think it's gonna be a while before I can get organized enough to roll a new release, but this edge line option, as well as the camera and near/far clip plane controls, have been added to the sources if you want to try it out. You can get (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
I did some work on LDLite this weekend. An image of an LDLite rendered town.mpd is at: (URL) image used the -fr option to turn off lines, and has ldlite shading turned on, so it looks a little different than the others. Rendering time was 828 (...) (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
I added some depth-queuing to LDLite, with a simple fade-to-black as you get away from the camera, in the hopes that it would let the green trees stand out from the green baseplates: (URL) anyone find this useful? -gyug (...) (23 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
(...) variations? (Fade to white, or fade to gray, or desaturate as you go back) --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (URL) (23 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
Yes, I'm trying various shadings. This one looks promising: (URL) trees in the upper left stand out well. I really like the shading on the water tower, and the green roof on the yellow house looks nice. Shading is done by taking the dot product of (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
|
Wow, that looks great. Don't really know what else to say... just wanted you to know that people were paying attention, and were interested in your results. :-) -Andy Lynch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Gyugyi" <paul@gyugyi.com> To: (...) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (and POV preview question)
|
|
I'm not sure if I mentioned this yet, but the pesky ldglite bugs with MESA perspective mode have been fixed and a new version is up on the sourceforge. I still have to incorporate the new ldlite 2.3 bugfix for large MPD files, but it works for now (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (and POV preview question)
|
|
Don Heyse wrote... (...) ;-) (...) If you want to make a previewer for finding a good camera setting you should adjust the camera location and look_at positions. When done, specify these two coordinates to L3P using -cc and -cla. As mentioned at the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (and POV preview question)
|
|
(...) I'm not sure if I *want* to do this, I was just asking if it would be useful. I asked because I already added -cc and -ca (not sure what -cla is) to ldglite so I could move the camera enough to test my recent bug fixes. Since I tend to add (...) (23 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (and POV preview question)
|
|
Should we change the default view to be something that is (what is the word..."only made from rotation matricies and does not produce shearing"? det(A)=1?). It bugs me that the default is flawed that way, although there are some other (...) (23 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (and POV preview question)
|
|
(...) How about if we just separate the shearing "oblique" projection transformation from the underlying modeling transformation? I'd be happy using this for the default matrix. 0.707104,0,0.707104,...5,0.612372 I think it's a 45 degree spin and a (...) (23 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug report (and POV preview question)
|
|
I like that idea. If the default view is what you said (the [0.707104 ...] matrix), then a projection matrix of 1.4142,0,0,0,1.2196,...171,1.2247 in front of it would give the same effect as the original LDRAW default matrix. I've wanted to pull out (...) (23 years ago, 7-Sep-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
