CAD Development : 1318

CAD / Development / 1318

1317 | 1319

Subject:	Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 1999 21:38:58 GMT
Viewed:	206 times

Primitives are handled by the primitives group, and should be sent to the group. I see no purpose in having them in the cad.dat.parts. What do you mean by "Dat versions of bitmaps"? -John Van Todd Lehman wrote in message ... > In lugnet.cad.dev, Dragonelf1@aol.com (Jeff Stembel) writes: > > What about new Primitives? Would they go into the .parts subcatagory? > > Also, I'm somewhat talented at making the small bitmaps for new parts. > > Would they (Dat versions of the bitmaps) go into the .parts subcategory > > also? > > I would think so...rather than .parts.prim and .parts.bmp -- unless there's > a real clear advantage to having these separated. > > --Todd

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
(...) Bitmaps that have been run through a BMP2DAT tool. Steve (27 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
(...) I would think so...rather than .parts.prim and .parts.bmp -- unless there's a real clear advantage to having these separated. --Todd (27 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)

27 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact