| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
<Snipped the Lengthy but interesting Message>
What about new Primitives? Would they go into the .parts subcatagory? Also,
I'm somewhat talented at making the small bitmaps for new parts. Would they
(Dat versions of the bitmaps) go into the .parts subcategory also?
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy
|
| (...) I like those. I think "sets" is a lot clearer than anything containing the letters "tlg", especially when placed alongside "parts" or "elements" and "creations." It's also nice and short, easy to type. :) OK, let's summarize all of the (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
