Subject:
|
Re: What do LDraw dev people use for multiplatform development
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 May 2010 19:08:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
37951 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Remi Gagne wrote:
> wxWidgets isn't bad, but for serious, heavy-UI applications, Qt is far, far
> better. Its QtCreator IDE & debugger isn't bad either, and is easy to get
> started with. And QtDesigner, its drag-n-drop UI developer, is one of the few
> such tools I've seen that generates useful code. Good stuff.
>
> May I ask, what kind of applications are you developing that require native
> code, and for which Java is too slow? These days, device drivers,
> graphically-intense video games, and computationally-expensive scientific apps
> are about the only things I can think of that require native code... and with
> good wrapper libraries, even most of those are questionable.
>
> Remi
Thanks,
I've been looking at Qt but as far I understand it's license doesn't permit
commercially static linked closed applications, something I need for my business
projects. I know you could link dynamically but that probably raises all kinds
of dependency problems.
The main reason I always worked using Delphi is the fact it produces such nice
self sustained applications it will run on any recent out of the box windows. So
while making the migration to multi platform I somehow want to preserve that
feature.
About native code, well I might just be a purist but I always find it nice to
get those extra couple of milliseconds at places where it really counts (eg a
rendering engine). Also I have developed some cad programs work wise and might
need to do more in the future, so I thought why not use Native all the time to
keep things simple.
Thanks again for your input.
Roland
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|