Subject:
|
Re: MPD file loading search order
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:43:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2883 times
|
| |
|
|
Anders Isaksson wrote:
> If that is your work development system, I think you've made a mistake, if
> it's your personal one I can definitely understand postponing the expense!
> D2006 is (after some patches) really snappy, feature-packed, relatively bug
> free (compared to D6-2005), and on average produces faster code than earlier
> versions. Hot-fixes are turning up on the Borland web site, so the wait for
> bug fixes has been shortened too. Judging by the talk on Borland newsgroups,
> D2006 is 'the thing' :-) (except if you need to work with .NET 2.0)
It's my work system, but I rarely use 2005. Most of my customer projects
demand use of Delphi 6 Pro. Because that's what the customer itself
owns. I maintain their code so I have to use their tools.
Because of this I don't justify spending money on an upgrade.
I know D2005 is very buggy even with all service packs. But for my usage
it's actually quite stable except for some minor ide problems.
So that's why i decided to wait for 2007 before upgrading, to get the
best of 2006 and some extras :)
Besides 2007 is rumored for release in December so there's a big change
my project's release will be compiled with BDS 2007.
Roland
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MPD file loading search order
|
| (...) Don't know about that, source-wise (all my work projects are still Delphi, Win32 only). In .NET you definitely don't have to care about the language an assembly was written in, you just use it. (...) If that is your work development system, I (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jul-06, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
