 | | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Now I'm confused. How do you post if the email is invalid? Confirmation email for every post goes to the email address attached to the (possibly spam-blocked) email you list in each post. If the address isn't valid, you don't get the (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth synthesis and needed sub-parts
|
|
(...) That sounds reasonable. We've done this before, with light.dat. Do the files have comments identifying what they are used for? If they're going into the official library, it'd nice to try and make them useable by any program doing the same (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth synthesis and needed sub-parts
|
|
(...) I'd suggest that LS00.dat belongs in the PARTS directory because it's designed to be manipulated directly by the end user when creating a model file (much like a regular part, and unlike the files in the S subdir). If you put it in S, it'll be (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth synthesis and needed sub-parts
|
|
(...) I also forgot to ask about some of the electrical parts.... Rotation sensor, light sensor, electrical cable ends officially have a small stub of rectangular cable coming out of them. This motivated me to modify these parts and use unofficial (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LSynth synthesis and needed sub-parts
|
|
Hi Steve, Chris, Orion, I'm bringing out a new version of LSynth. LSynth originally had a number of unofficial parts that it used to specify and synthesize flexible parts. Where possible I've eliminated the unoffical parts that could easily be (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Because you hadn't yet went to the URL I pointed to, and/or no human had yet approved it. Reminder, this is it: (URL) and you should remember, there will be a lag, a human has to look at it and decide if it's valid. (...) Here's a hint back, (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) I second this. For some reason, Lugnet isn't using my updated email address in my new posts. (Here's a hint: SPROAT.US is gone, SPROAT.NET works.) The ONLY reason I even knew of this thread is because I went ego-surfing on Lugnet today. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For example: (URL) (just the one I picked off the top of my head) Those people that are getting mail but ignoring Orion... why? This is important. The impact to the entire community will be somewhat negative, we may have to run with two (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For all the asterisked people, yes. This is how I found the bulk majority of the people whose email was unknown. Also, some of the people on the list are still posting here on Lugnet but for whatever reason have not contacted me. This is why I (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Just wondering if you've tried a Google search using their name (e.g. "Jeff Findley") to see if you can find a new email address. Thanks, Jeff (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
Hi Stefan I don't know anything about neither optional lines or the programs you're converting from, but from a parts reviewers perspective, I'd say that the teapot.ldr looks pretty good. I wouldn't worry so much about automatic subpart generation. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts editing made easy (well, easier)
|
|
(I posted this to lugnet.cad toplevel, but considering the total lack of response, I decided to try it down here in .dev instead, where I got all that nice feedback for my last post.) After a couple of days of coding fun, I finally have the ASE to (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
It's been a month and a half since the LDraw.org Steering Committee announced the LDraw.org Contributor Agreement. The response has been overwhelming with may positive comments and many old time authors contacting us with their support. We currently (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting by line
|
|
(...) Another thought, maybe sorting on the center of the axis-aligned bounding box for the line? For lines this would be the center of the line but would it be the center of the tri or quad? My visualzation skills are elluding me at the moment. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy, anyone?
|
|
Update: the converter works and is posted to the top level newsgroup, "lugnet.cad". (URL) to come. We should perhaps move discussions back here to .dev for intricate details like feature requests and bug reports, but you can also send me e-mail, and (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of arbitrary elements with LSynth
|
|
(...) Hi all, I have rewritten much of LSynth's code so that it is table driven. Currently the tables are coded in the program, but the important thing is that definitions of synthesized things are tabular. I've added a string type that uses your (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy, anyone?
|
|
I'm replying to my own post to keep a low profile for the time being. The project is not quite finished yet, but I have some good news I'd like to share with you: I now have a working file converter that takes ASE export input from 3dsmax and writes (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting by line
|
|
(...) IMO, it would be best with a dialog when sorting is requested. Remember all the settings from the last time sorting was used. (...) If there is no choice for the user, I'd say keep them at the top as you do now. A checkbox for removing them (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting by line
|
|
(...) It's hard to say what would be best. I personally think that having a dialog with all the sort options along with a quick way to apply the most recently used sort options might be the most flexible. That way, people who use the feature (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting by line
|
|
(...) That's what I did in the map I did but if you can make them "sticky" meaning that they stay by some other line in the file (the one that they precede?) that might be interesting. Might not be useful though. (...) Those are good, Also if you (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
