Subject:
|
Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:42:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
16604 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss wrote:
| |
Hey! While we’re extending the language, can we also allow MPD in part
files?
|
This is the first time I’ve heard this mentioned. Can someone tell me why this
would be useful? I’m certainly open to the possibility, but only if it provides
a concrete benefit, and I’m not having any luck coming up with what that benefit
would be. It would decrease the number of files in the parts library, but it
would also make any internal files inaccessible to other parts. And given that
the internal files would be in the s subpart directory anyway, I’m not sure that
decreasing the number of files is all that useful. But I’m certainly open to
the possibility that I’ve missed something.
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) I think eliminating part-specific subfiles would be a nice file-management benefit, if nothing else. I expect that reducing the number of part-specific subfiles would speed up the part-approval process, always a good thing. The most important (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| (...) Considering the general pace we've alway had with LDraw.org, "sooner than expected" would be impressive. ;) (...) Actually, I'm not sure I've ever seen example source LDR/image files, or even a definition of the syntax. (...) True. But now (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
68 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
