 | | '59 Cadillac Eldorado Hovercar [DAT]
|
|
Here's the model I mentioned in .space. Please LMKWYT! --Bram 0 FILE hvrcaddy.dat 0 '59 Cadillac Eldorado Hovercar 0 Name: hvrcaddy.dat 0 Author: Bram Lambrecht <blambrec@student.chuh.org> 0 1 0 -65.62 1.62 140 -0.71 -0.71 0 -0.71 0.71 0 0 0 -1 (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Helfire - a microfig scale castle town [DAT]
|
|
(...) Sorry, but they won't be around for at least another 1000 years. :-, But in the meantime, here's a slightly less anachronistic item for ya. It's the almost-seaworthy project of the village idiot (who will later be celebrated in the Renaissance (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | mecha shoulder design [DAT]
|
|
...Its not the best design, but it does work and can be sculpted fairly well. It uses a hinge brick with a hinge plate to improve friction, a click hinge gives it vertical rotation. It also is nice because the design limits motion outside of 'normal (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine about 8 studs wide. I think that I can do it, even though I wasn't so sure earlier, but you reinspired me. I have been able to create doors that fold up, and don't look to bad, and wheels that fold down. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine for Minifigs, but I gave up because I could'nt build it right. It started looking like a truck and things only got worse from there. The hardest part that I could not figure out was how to fold the wheels under (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | 6889/6939 combo Alternate (roc n' rule) [DAT]
|
|
i like the godzilla models that the clone brand kawada came out with so here is my attempt at Rodan. there's a spot on the back for a rider/pilot to sit. ..joseph g 0 ROC N' ROLL - 6889/6939 combo Alternate 0 Name: ROCNROLL.DAT 0 Author: Joseph (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: 6970
|
|
Great model. Looks good for the OMR when the planet logo parts are made official. I assume you are going to put it up for the ldraw.org official model repository. There is 1 problem with the dat file that I can see: it is missing the flag that is (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | 6970 [DAT]
|
|
This is as best a reproduction of the 6970 Beta-1 Command Base as I can manage. Four parts have been substituted in, and are annotated as such. 0 FILE 6970.dat 0 Set 6970 - Beta 1 base 0 Name: 6970.dat 0 Author: Cat <cat@ihug.co.nz> 0 0 The next (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) Funny, I'm in the process of building the exact same thing! So far, I've collected a bunch of images off the web and started trying to make wheels that fold under. I'd really like the model to be motorized and have steering, too, which makes (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.build and lugnet.cad ] Fred: (...) You're welcome. - It wasn't much work. (...) If you have more constraints on the mountain - like at ground level at the edges or a 32*32 flat top - please tell me, and I will see what I can do about (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | My Lego "Mech" [DAT]
|
|
This model attached here was inspired by "The Lego-bots Headquarters" webpage, located at (URL) is a model that I built awhile ago. Unfourtunatly, the legs do not actualy connect to the main frame of the rest of the model. That is why I have been (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: One of my favorite movies.
|
|
(...) it's just so cute! I like it :) Dan (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | One of my favorite movies. [DAT]
|
|
Here is a robot that I recently created. To see him with his laser out, just change the text to say johnny2.dat, instead of johnny.dat. It is heavily based on the movie "Short Curcuit." This file is an MPD, so you will need a viewer that can read (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) Hey, it's the thought that counts. Actually, I was planning on using the BURPS, but I can't seem to put them together in any good organization. When trying to make something that big, I get a little flustered. Besides, I have been very busy (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
Hey, thanks for the file, but it isn't quite what I was looking for. It does impress me though. How did you build it, did you just use a program? If yes, what one? What I'm seeing is just a bunch of BURPS with the spaces filled in, basically. But (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
Mouser: (...) I have just given it a fast try. Have a look at (URL) like that? Something you would like to have changed? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL: (URL) > -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
Perhaps this tool would help: (URL) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models) !
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
Pardon me for being stupid; I didn't look at the category before I replied. With CAD, you don't have to worry about weight. But, I still can't do it. Sorry. -Chris (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I can't do it for you; I don't have the resources nor the time. But, I can give a suggestion. BURPS. Lots and lots of BURPS. They're ugly, yes, but they'll make the mountain look good and keep it light. Plus, they stack in various patterns (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
I am trying to build a greenhouse and I want to have a mountain in the middle. I haven't figured out any good ways to make one though, so I was wondering if anyone would build one for me, please? I would request that it is about 50 studs wide (at (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Set-posting protocol
|
|
(...) The best way IMHO to do this is to use a normal baseplate instead of the crater baseplate, leave the figs helmentless & use the non patterned versions for the patterned parts. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Set-posting protocol
|
|
I've just finished reconstructing the first lego set I ever owned (set 6970) in .dat format... however, there are four parts in that set that don't seem to have dat files yet... those being: The crater baseplate (x2) The classic minifig space-helmet (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) The roll cage on mine doesn't open anyway...the driver has to enter through the side or top. I wonder what I could use to make forks that would fit...short (ie, fat) antennas, maybe? --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
Sorry about the last message; sounded kinda rude. Anyway, yeah they (claws) would look more like forks if they were longer, but then how would the operator get out while carrying a load? Oh well, seems like every loader would have that problem (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) Cool! I just looked through all your renderings, and they look nice! I might have to render the loader in the Pentapterigoid hangar... --Bram (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
I see what you're saying, but I think they could work as forks rather than arms. Ben -- Ben Vaughan ben@marsbase.com (URL) Pejic" <milovan@netcom.ca> wrote in message news:FruHuu.38z@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) pleasing, (...) would (...) cargo (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) If you like my renderings, check out what I did with this YAL: (URL) can see the problems with the hands. This was made by loading the file into L3LAB, writing a POV file, and hand tweeking the 1x1 round plates. Not to mention setting the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
How could it lift cargo if the rollbar gets in the way? Look at them, they can't touch each other and are way too small to hold large objects. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) There's a beta version of L3P which does recognize the LDLite commands, and I would guess that the DAT->POV converter in L3Lab would too, as L3Lab does. (Is that the converter the beta L3P?) (...) Reminds me...I should try installing the new (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) aesthetically (...) loader. It (...) more (...) That's about the only thing I figure you could use this for... sort of like a fork lift... (...) Thanks! --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) You can tell the arms were an afterthought...while building, I left the last stud on the 3x1 inverse slopes uncovered so I could attach arms later. When I finally added the arms (last), this design was all I could come up with. I was mainly (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) ;-) Thanks! True, if the pilot doesn't mind tipping on his back, this thing can have quite a stride :) Someone interested in getting seasick could have a lot of fun in this loader... --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) I really enjoy seeing your renderings. You have some mighty impressive castle stuff on your pages. Keep it up! :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) That's much better, however, even in L3LAB, the hands don't attach to the arms. How can I fix it? I really enjoying rendering these images for my desktop wallpaper. -Chuck (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) Try viewing it with LDLite or L3Lab. The minifig was made using LDao's Minifig Modeler, which spits out code with LDLite language extensions. MLCAD and L3P don't recognize the LDLite commands, so they render incorrectly. BTW: the newest (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Arm size an issue? (Was: YAL: Yet Another Loader :))
|
|
(...) LOL -- Barbara's first words after seeing my loader were, "it's a crab? no, is it a gorilla?" I think that means the arms were too big. :-, (...) Yah, it does seem silly to put such large arms on a walking loader. The arms I put on mine, and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
I love the loader, but the minifig seems to hav had a melt down. When I load it into mlcad, or convert it with L3P, the minifig parts are all stacked on top of each other like they were not transformed or rotated. Is anyone else seing this? -Chuck (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
(...) I like it. Love the legs, love the rollbars. And, given a powerful enough auto-balancing system, it looks like it could do a mean sprint. ;-) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
|
I think I'd have to disagree with you Mladen. If those were pneumatic or hydraulically driven arms or forks like on a fork lift, they'd probably be plenty strong. Anything bigger, while perhaps more aesthetically pleasing, would most likely leave (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
