To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.modelsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.models in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Models / 1135
1134  |  1136
Subject: 
Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.models
Date: 
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 01:49:06 GMT
Viewed: 
5770 times
  
Sorry about the last message; sounded kinda rude. Anyway, yeah they (claws)
would look more like forks if they were longer, but then how would the
operator get out while carrying a load? Oh well, seems like every loader
would have that problem anyway!

Mladen Pejic, over and out!
http://tor-pw1.netcom.ca/~milovan/index.htm

In lugnet.cad.dat.models, Ben Vaughan writes:
> I see what you're saying, but I  think they could work as forks rather than
> arms.
> 
> Ben
> --
> Ben Vaughan
> ben@marsbase.com
> http://www.marsbase.com
> 
> 
> "Mladen Pejic" <milovan@netcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:FruHuu.38z@lugnet.com...
> > How could it lift cargo if the rollbar gets in the way? Look at them, they
> > can't touch each other and are way too small to hold large objects.
> > 
> > Mladen Pejic, over and out!
> > http://tor-pw1.netcom.ca/~milovan/index.htm
> > 
> > In lugnet.cad.dat.models, Ben Vaughan writes:
> > > I think I'd have to disagree with you Mladen.  If those were pneumatic or
> > > hydraulically driven arms or forks like on a fork lift, they'd probably • be
> > > plenty strong.  Anything bigger, while perhaps more aesthetically • pleasing,
> > > would most likely leave the cargo to far in front of the loader.  It • would
> > > be much to front/top heavy to be practical.  Bigger arms would be more
> > > practical if this thing were fighting the alien queen, but for moving • cargo
> > > crates, they seem fine.  I give it a thumbs up.
> > > 
> > > Great work, Bram!
> > > 
> > > Ben
> > > --
> > > Ben Vaughan
> > > ben@marsbase.com
> > > http://www.marsbase.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > "Mladen Pejic" <milovan@netcom.ca> wrote in message
> > > news:Frt15K.C2M@lugnet.com...
> > > > Awesome Bram. The arms however... Need more work. Maybe you should try
> > > > mounting Aquanaut or Divers arm pieces on the bottom... OR better yet • ask
> > > > Jeremy, he outta' know how to add arms...
> > > > 
> > > > Mladen Pejic, over and out!
> > > > http://tor-pw1.netcom.ca/~milovan/index.htm
> > > > 
> > > > In lugnet.cad.dat.models, Bram Lambrecht writes:
> > > > > I don't know if this little vehicle would be any good at actually • loading
> > > > > stuff, but it can at least carry little things around.  If someone has • a
> > > > > better idea for arms, please share.
> > > > > As always, please LMKWYT!
> > > > > --Bram
> > > > > 
> > > > > Snip .DAT<



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
 
(...) The roll cage on mine doesn't open anyway...the driver has to enter through the side or top. I wonder what I could use to make forks that would fit...short (ie, fat) antennas, maybe? --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com (...) (27 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
 
I see what you're saying, but I think they could work as forks rather than arms. Ben -- Ben Vaughan ben@marsbase.com (URL) Pejic" <milovan@netcom.ca> wrote in message news:FruHuu.38z@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) pleasing, (...) would (...) cargo (...) (27 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)

20 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR