Subject:
|
Re: Chrome Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:43:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
714 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> I'm still not likely to have any kind of reflectiveness any time soon, but I
> played with the specular values and came up with some values that I think do
> a reasonbly good job:
>
> http://home.san.rr.com/tcobbs/LDView/metallic.png
>
> The row on the front/right are gold, chrome, and electric contacts (from
> front left to back right). In the back/left, I put yellow, white, and light
> gray for comparison.
>
> Let me know what you think.
Hmm. The gold looks the best, I think it's at least partly because we
can establish a color value for gold that is distinct from the standard
yellow. The electric contact is second-best, IMO. I just couldn't see
enough difference between the chrome and white.
Could you try rendering a dark gray with the 'specular enhancements'?
Try using RGB 635F52.
Of course (did I mention this before?) once we get better rendering of
'metallic' elements, we'll have to revisit the color codes, and split
out 'plated chrome' from 'printed silver' from 'embedded silver' ...
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Chrome Parts
|
| (...) I'm still not likely to have any kind of reflectiveness any time soon, but I played with the specular values and came up with some values that I think do a reasonbly good job: (URL) row on the front/right are gold, chrome, and electric (...) (22 years ago, 11-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
