Subject:
|
Re: Chrome Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:33:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
839 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> I'll have to test these in ldglite and see how they compare to ldlite.
> Does ldlite render them correctly?
By 'correctly', do you mean does ldlite generate solid-colors for these
values? Yes, for some. I haven't tried all of them.
PartsrefBuilder uses custom color definitions for all colors, which
pretty much totally bypass the regular color definitions, especially the
color codes in the extended range (256-511) (because the version of
LDLite I have (2.4) doesn't allow color codes in the dithered range
(256-511) to be redefined on the COLOR statement).
> Some of those color names sound
> newer than the most recent version of ldlite.
I didn't pull the color names from ldlite, I got them from the official
reference on ldraw.org, <http://www.ldraw.org/reference/specs/colors>.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Chrome Parts
|
| (...) Yes and it works the same way on ldglite. There's also a tutorial on how to do this with the tools on ldraw.org if you want cut out the Windows box. (URL)Let's see, right now, we've got defined codes (in the dithering range) (...) I'll have to (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
