Subject:
|
Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:42:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1254 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Orion Pobursky wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad, Niels Bugge wrote:
| |
Finally I render the part in Pov-ray (via L3DAO) to
check the part for gaps (where planes don’t meet creating a black line) and
if the studlogos is turning the right way.
|
How imported is the orrientation of the studlogos?
Should these face exactly the same direction as the real part?
Or do they just have to be readable (thus not mirrored) and all studlogos on
one part face the same direction (unless the real part has studlogos facing
different directions?
I have seen a few files on the PT with the studlogos rotated 90 or 180
degrees compared with the real part.
|
Since stud logos are not part of the DAT format, the fact that they are
rotated or mirrored is not a problem with a part. That said, since most
users like to use the stud logo option for some renders, if problems with the
stud logos are noticed it should probably be noted in the review. However,
these problems alone are not cause for a hold vote. If you can’t bring
yourself to certify, that’s what novote is for.
-Orion
|
Yes - these kind of errors are not a cause for a hold.
I’m with Orion on stud rotation, but I’d prefer not to have parts/subparts
designed in a way that causes mirrored studs. We have set a precedent with car
doors, by moving the stud from the mirror-able subpart into each main part file.
I’d like to use a similar concept for new parts that have mirror imaged
versions.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
| (...) So I understand that studlogos may face any direction as long as they are not mirrored? How about a mix of rotated studlogos on one single part instead of all studslogos facing the same direction? E.g. some studlogos readable when the part is (...) (20 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| | | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
| (...) Is this true? I've been out of the "official update" loop for a while, but when I suggested this method a year or so ago it was rejected due to "sub-part clutter" and the fears of an unreasonable burden upon parts-authors. Has this changed (...) (20 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
| (...) Since stud logos are not part of the DAT format, the fact that they are rotated or mirrored is not a problem with a part. That said, since most users like to use the stud logo option for some renders, if problems with the stud logos are (...) (20 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
