To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 11955
11954  |  11956
Subject: 
Re: I want to become a reviewer
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 04:47:22 GMT
Viewed: 
1200 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
   In lugnet.cad, Niels Bugge wrote:
   Well, running a bit back and forth in the file will give you a sense of the part just as well, and the you avoid starting out with a maze of lines: The biggest problem is that without the framing lines, the polygons is extremely difficult to figure out, since you’re left with the subtle differences in shading to figure out how they’re extended in space (and if they’re in front or behind earlier sections. A maze of lines won’t help on that, and that’s why I like the polygons and corresponding lines to be grouped intimately together (based on the polygon). But I guess that’s a question of style, if you consider the polygons to be extended inside a frame of lines or that the lines just edges different sections of the “peal” (surface).

I’m going to go on a bit more on this, please bear with me.

There are two extremes -- one extreme would be to put *all* edges at the top of the file, then all polygons. The other extreme would be interleave edges and polygons, defining each edge just before the first polygon that touches it. I don’t find either of these extremes to be optimal. I prefer to get a block of edge commands, logically grouped. Then a block of the polygons that go with those edges. It’s easier (IMO) to make sense of things when only type of line is (immediately) involved.

While I don’t stick religiously to any formula, I do usually try to group “logical” sections together, sometimes even with comments! But I think generally I’ve found it easier to do the polygons first.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: I want to become a reviewer
 
(...) I'm going to go on a bit more on this, please bear with me. There are two extremes -- one extreme would be to put *all* edges at the top of the file, then all polygons. The other extreme would be interleave edges and polygons, defining each (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)

25 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR