Subject:
|
Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:31:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1342 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
| |
Yes - these kind of errors are not a cause for a hold.
I’m with Orion on stud rotation, but I’d prefer not to have parts/subparts
designed in a way that causes mirrored studs. We have set a precedent with
car doors, by moving the stud from the mirror-able subpart into each main
part file. I’d like to use a similar concept for new parts that have mirror
imaged versions.
|
So I understand that studlogos may face any direction as long as they are not
mirrored? How about a mix of rotated studlogos on one single part instead of all
studslogos facing the same direction? E.g. some studlogos readable when the part
is seen from the right, other studlogo’s readable when the part is seen from the
front, etc.
Niels
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
| (...) Not a reason for a hold. If you have the energy to correctly orientate the studs, that's great, but we won't prevent a file being released for this reason alone. Chris (20 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
| (...) Yes - these kind of errors are not a cause for a hold. I'm with Orion on stud rotation, but I'd prefer not to have parts/subparts designed in a way that causes mirrored studs. We have set a precedent with car doors, by moving the stud from the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
