Subject:
|
Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:14:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1403 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
|
We have set a precedent with
car doors, by moving the stud from the mirror-able subpart into each main
part file.
|
Is this true? Ive been out of the official update loop for a while, but
when I suggested this method a year or so ago it was rejected due to
sub-part clutter and the fears of an unreasonable burden upon
parts-authors. Has this changed since I last checked? If so, cool!
Dave!
|
Yes - check out 3821.dat and 3822.dat issued in the 2003-03 update - they both
use s3822s01.dat but include the stud reference in the main file.
Im not looking for a mass of existing parts to be re-submitted just to
implement this technique, but Ill support this for new parts, as with
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/43722.dat and
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/43723.dat
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
| (...) Hi all If it's combined with BFC-ing or other fix I think mass resubmitting is ok. I think I've managed to pursuade GuyVivan to do exactly that when he's BFC-ing... Just remember that if you whish to check a file for this error you have to (...) (20 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
| (...) Is this true? I've been out of the "official update" loop for a while, but when I suggested this method a year or so ago it was rejected due to "sub-part clutter" and the fears of an unreasonable burden upon parts-authors. Has this changed (...) (20 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|