 | | Re: Names for Bionicle Bohrok parts
|
|
(...) Well, Huw, between your inventories of the Bohrok sets and my adding of their parts to BrickLink, I think consolidation of name ideas would be quite useful. I've already started on a basic naming convention for them based on Mark Riley's (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Names for Bionicle Bohrok parts
|
|
I have submitted an inventory of 8563 to peeron, and now the new parts need naming. Here are images of them: (URL) am not sure of the formal procedure for allocating names, but Dan suggested I try here :-) Huw (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
|
|
"Anthony Sava" <savatheaggie@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gr4KxB.D65@lugnet.com... (...) aroung (...) If you render your models in POV, you directly interface with it. Unless you use L3PAO's render when finished converting option... When I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: need help w/ name (minifig legs from set #4817)
|
|
(...) Yes - 4b is the next unused code. That's fine, Chris (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Limits on participation in MOTM/SOTM? (Was: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
|
|
(...) I agree with Jacob, here. No limits. If we start getting large numbers of entries each month, I might change my mind -- at least, make it clear that the contest admin can ask people to "unsubmit" entries that are too similiar to recent (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud logos in fan apps
|
|
(...) Well, I have to say that this is much more gracious than I dared hope! My site is somewhere between "god-awful" and "really lame," but I hope to embellish it somewhat whenever I get off my posterior. Let me know if anything on the site as it (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud logos in fan apps
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hmq26uc4vm7ggq4...4ax.com... (...) Sounds like a good idea. It can become a section of the Links page. One thing I have to do is put back the linking images (make new ones first), and get Bram (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: need help w/ name (minifig legs from set #4817)
|
|
(...) Thanks for tracking down the part number from Peeron, though - you should post that comment when you submit the file to the tracker. (...) I think 4b is alright. (...) How about: 970p4b Minifig Hips with Leather Belt/Straps Pattern 971p4b (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud logos in fan apps
|
|
(...) with LDraw". It could like to the page made by Dave! And, it could link to the KDraw pages (er, those K-nex files were put on the web somewhere, weren't they?). This would allow LDraw.org to remain within the spirit of being LEGO-focused, (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 168135a.dat - Sticker Technic Supercar 4x4x4 Logo
|
|
(...) Hmm. I opened this in LDLite 2.4, put it into 'twirl mode', and there was some serious bleedthru at various (odd) angles. I didn't try twirling the original (1LDU-high) file. LDraw and LEdit handled the file just fine. But I didn't try to (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
|
|
(...) In (...) I'm sorry you had to nit-pick, because you're wrong about me. I did not mean that I was going to 'LDraw' my dragons. Yes, I know that MLCad is a gui program that makes LDraw easier to use (at least for me), but I don't go aroung (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LGEO parts
|
|
Hi all, Is there any change that the LGEO-parts will be updated or be made bug-free where neccesary? I encountered one (or more?) bugs this afternoon (sorry I couldn't be bothered to write them down) and it erm... bugs me a bit. Jeroen (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
|
|
(...) I was hoping someone would say this. =) I know that creating 'earth' backgrounds is much harder than space ones. So on this note perhaps those artists that create non-space themes this month would be willing to write a tutorial or two for the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 3D applet of my ISCC entry
|
|
I like it. Lets see more!! -Chuck (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | RE: MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
|
|
(...) I think this is because Space is relatively easy to render compared to a scene on the ground. It takes quite some practice and knowledge of POV-Ray to get nice lighting and a good background in a scene if you need to include a ground plane, a (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
|
|
"Ahui Herrera" <jedi_agh@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gr4EvA.L7t@lugnet.com... (...) LOL :-) (...) In (...) Well, Ahui, I wasn't going to say anything here. But definitely glad I have a loyal convert to back me up ;-) I hope the wording I am (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts List mis-ordered?
|
|
(...) Sorry to reply to my own post, but I figured out what was going on. For some reason, the parts.lst file was rewritten. I deleted this file, and upon opening MLCad again, I was prompted to rebuild the parts.lst file. I did, and now everything (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
|
|
I'm going to be Tim C. Jr. here and say it... MLCading? (...) Anthony, don't you mean you are going to "LDraw" all four of your dragons. Yes, I'm a newly converted LDraw System of Tools person. I think we should start using the proper namings when (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002
|
|
(...) showcased. It all comes down to what is the purpose of the contest/showcase? If the purpose is to showcase the absolute best models, then there should be no limits at all on participation, other than that a model which has won already should (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002
|
|
(...) I think that putting any more constraints on the submissions would be counter productive. We (I, in this case:) want to see as many contestants as possible and don't want to impose any restrictions on the kind of work submitted. If someone (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
