To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *20740 (-20)
  Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
 
(...) Yes, I believe they are. I haven't rechecked lately to see if anything has changed. If I get a chance in the next few days I will recheck it. (...) I understand and agree. I will cease making any comments on them. (...) really? ok. (...) Paul (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
 
(...) Looks good. (...) I have used the phrase "0 end of subpart", "0 end of file", etc in some of the parts I have made. Will these get rejected? I usually always try to keep them lowercase. (...) I'm not sure about this one. I feel that new parts (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Road sign square with clip  [DAT]
 
I've modified this part from the triangle Roadsign Clip-on so whoever modelled the clip part, thanks. The part doesn't have a number on it and I can't find a reference to it on LUGNET partsref but Peeron has it at (URL) It comes in set 7127 in (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
 
Steve: (...) I assume that L3P reports the relevant lines, so it is trivial to remove one of the offending ones. (...) Right. Set a reasonably large threshold (0.1?) and reject based on it. Jacob (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
 
(...) [snip areas of agreement] (...) Which is sloppy, but not a killer error. (...) I didn't list the non-coplanar message with the "reject" group is because the thresholds of coplanarity are variable, not fixed. So we need to agree on what level (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: for TECHNIC fans
 
Great! But do you have picture? Zhengrong (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  for TECHNIC fans  [DAT]
 
Hi all, The purpose of this vehicle was to create a self driving car with different speeds, as light (weight) as possible, but stable and with a small turning circle. It has the ability to center the steering position automatically, measures (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
 
Steve: (...) [...] Seems okay. (...) [...] Seems okay. (...) I would say yes. The last two definitely should, since they indicate unneeded resource use. The first one should really be split in to two triangles, if it really is intended to be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  I need some Help
 
Hello I have some problems with L3PAO, When I try to convert my .DAT files over to .POV files using L3PA0 and I open it in Pov-Ray, the script says the file is empty. I tried converting .MPD to .POV with no prevail. Is there something wrong with my (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
 
  Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
 
Hey y'all- I'm just sort of starting to get to adding L3P-check'ing to the Parts Tracker submit function. I took a look at the documented messages, and tried to sort them out according to whether or not any particular error was cause to reject a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: "Dilur" and "Kicker" .DAT files
 
wow, the dilur model is simply mind-bending. i can't believe the way you have that ammo belt coming out of the cannister and twisting around to feed into the gun. i'm quite glad you posted a message to this group because i don't always check the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
 
(...) And I want to say "Thank You!" to Paul for doing this -- Lars Hassing has performed a similar service in the past, emailing the L3P messages to part authors. We[1] are in the process of incorporating L3P into the part submission function. I (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker Activity Page
 
(...) I've taken some time away from the process of posting the backlog of parts to the tracker. I will get back to finish the job, but other tasks have higher priorities. Basically, I needed to finish developing the Parts Tracker.[1] It didn't make (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: carriage house / former hospital - Datsville
 
Thanks for the nice comments, guys. I was thinking maybe somewhere in between the grocery store and the courthouse would be nice, so that it's facing the courthouse and at the southeastern-most corner of the empty lot. This way the gateway of my (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  Re: carriage house / former hospital - Datsville
 
That is really, really great! It also exposes some of the mistakes I've made in making my model. I guess it's not as finished as I thought it was. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker Activity Page
 
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:GLBGz8.12E@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) Are you still going through the parts that had already been submitted prior to the new parts tracker too? Just wondering as the only part I've (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
 
(...) Ok, I'm the guilty party who posted such notes on the tracker. :) I still pass a part with these errors. Some of my earler parts have these too. L3P issues several "warnings" many are not required to correct to get passed. What I am watching (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: carriage house / former hospital - Datsville
 
That is sooo...ooo cool! How'd you do that!?!?!? (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  Re: New Car QTVR object.
 
(...) Thanks! I've finally figured out how to control the VR applet through the webpage. Another example is at (URL) its time to move on to park construction... Jimmy 8(:O)) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: New Car QTVR object.
 
(...) Cool start! Minimalist, but intriguing. I'm looking forward to seeing more soon. ;) Steve (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR