Subject:
|
Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:02:06 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
4779 times
|
| |
|
|
snipped a lot of stuff
In lugnet.admin.terms, Jake McKee wrote:
| |
Honestly, I’m a bit surprised that no one has commented more on this
particular update. This seems overly restrictive and I’m not exactly sure how
I feel about LUGNET terms now being based on German law.
Am I the only one that sees a serious problem with this clause?
|
You are not the only one with definite concerns about this change. I can
understand that Rene must operate with the law. But LUGNET’s (prior) strong
stand against censorship is a big deal to me. So this change, along with the
change to allow the deletion of posts at-will concern me a lot.
I’m concerned to the point where, depending on how this all pans out, I may or
may not continue to associate with LUGNET.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| (...) Hi Steve, things are never as bad as they seem. Though I reserve the right to cancel s.th., it doesn't mean that I make use of it, nowhere near. And for another thing: Nothing has really changed regarding this matter, it's more clear only. The (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| (...) Honestly, I'm a bit surprised that no one has commented more on this particular update. This seems overly restrictive and I'm not exactly sure how I feel about LUGNET terms now being based on German law. Am I the only one that sees a serious (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
