Subject:
|
Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:53:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6803 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Tim, Frank,
thanks for bringing this up.
In lugnet.admin.terms, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
Thinking on this particular issue I think I would prefer an extra set of
market guidelines sitting outside the main TOS. What if Factory starts paying
out an authors share? Then it becomes more grey since for some people the
Factory model might be the only version of the model. Having a separate
guideline means having something that can be changed to deal with new issues
more than changing the TOS to deal with every new case.
|
I like this idea very much. So the ToU could say (note 9.3.):
- Do not post information or material for commercial purposes which is not reasonably related to LEGO toys or which contains advertising which is not reasonably related to LEGO toys.
9.1. Do not post small ads, want ads and any other information for commercial purposes in discussion groups other than lugnet.market, unless a discussion group explicitly welcomes their presence.
9.2. Do not post auction announcements, updates, or listings (“auction spam”) in discussion groups other than lugnet.market.auction, unless a discussion group explicitly welcomes their presence.
9.3. For further determinations and derogations, see also the Terms of Service for lugnet.market / market.lugnet.com (URL)
Please feel free to correct misspelling or choice of words.
-Rene
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| (...) I think something like 9.3 While the ultimate decision on market posts rests with the Admin of LUGNET, decisions will be made according to the guidelines found at URL which should be obeyed at all time. would be better. Tim (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| (...) I would be really happy if this particular issue would be straightend out. As have had causing a big problem with this myself, making clear what this all means would be great. I mean, I posted my MOC for sale in a theme group, with an intended (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| --various snippage-- (...) Thinking on this particular issue I think I would prefer an extra set of market guidelines sitting outside the main TOS. What if Factory starts paying out an authors share? Then it becomes more grey since for some people (...) (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
